08-13-2021, 10:55 AM
Pages: 1 2
08-13-2021, 06:09 PM
(08-13-2021, 10:55 AM)Klaus Wrote: [ -> ]Why not the E-M5 III? I'm still circling around this one.
Well, personally, I found the E-M1 just falls better in the hand, for me anyway. Like the EOS R. I don't have that with the E-M5s, probably because of the deeper handgrip on the E-M1s.
I had an E-M5 for about a year, and exchanged it for the E-M1 II when it came out. Very happy with it .
Also, AF-wise the E-M1s appear to be a little better.
08-13-2021, 11:41 PM
I don't doubt that the ergonomics of the E-M1 are better - for bigger boys at least.
But I've always been wondering about the AF claims vs the E-M1 III.
The sensor is the same (hence the AF modules) and it shares the TruePic XIII engine with the E-M1 II.
If the E-M5 III is really worse (based on the latest firmware), it is probably software-crippled.
I can't imagine that it is economical to develop different motherboards for these two - this may also explain why the E-M1 II still exists. It probably just doesn't cost much to manufacture it alongside the E-M5 III. It's basically just a different case.
I reckon I will wait for the E-M1 IV or M5 IV (or G9 II?).
FWIW, I've got the 12-45mm f/4 PRO here for testing. What a cute little zoom lens.
But I've always been wondering about the AF claims vs the E-M1 III.
The sensor is the same (hence the AF modules) and it shares the TruePic XIII engine with the E-M1 II.
If the E-M5 III is really worse (based on the latest firmware), it is probably software-crippled.
I can't imagine that it is economical to develop different motherboards for these two - this may also explain why the E-M1 II still exists. It probably just doesn't cost much to manufacture it alongside the E-M5 III. It's basically just a different case.
I reckon I will wait for the E-M1 IV or M5 IV (or G9 II?).
FWIW, I've got the 12-45mm f/4 PRO here for testing. What a cute little zoom lens.
08-14-2021, 09:59 AM
(08-13-2021, 11:41 PM)Klaus Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW, I've got the 12-45mm f/4 PRO here for testing. What a cute little zoom lens.
The local photographer shooting for Associated Press, the famous Dmitry Lovetsky, is using this one. So it's really PRO enough.
08-14-2021, 10:36 AM
(08-13-2021, 11:41 PM)Klaus Wrote: [ -> ]I don't doubt that the ergonomics of the E-M1 are better - for bigger boys at least.I am not in the latter category at all, TBVH. It isn't all that much bigger, millimeters, but the grip is quite a bit deeper.
Ergonomics is a very personal thing, and to me it just feels better.
Quote:But I've always been wondering about the AF claims vs the E-M1 III.It is all about the different AF algorithms they use in the E-M1 series, for eye-recognition and such. The boards are actually not identical as far as I am aware. Maybe the sensors are, but the processing boards are not.
The sensor is the same (hence the AF modules) and it shares the TruePic XIII engine with the E-M1 II.
If the E-M5 III is really worse (based on the latest firmware), it is probably software-crippled.
I can't imagine that it is economical to develop different motherboards for these two - this may also explain why the E-M1 II still exists. It probably just doesn't cost much to manufacture it alongside the E-M5 III. It's basically just a different case.
Quote:I reckon I will wait for the E-M1 IV or M5 IV (or G9 II?).I won't upgrade overnight either. I am quite happy with what I have availlable currentlly, althoug a Pen-F Mk II would be quite interesting indeed .
Quote:FWIW, I've got the 12-45mm f/4 PRO here for testing. What a cute little zoom lens.
Oooh, nice! Looking forard to the review ....
Kind regards, Wim
Pages: 1 2