IMO, what's really missing is a compact UWA prime, for instance a 8mm f2 or f2.8.
Also, a 40-150 f4 is too short. There is already a 40-150 f2.8 so what's the point?
Instead, a 50-250 f4 would be much more interesting and different from what's available.
(09-09-2021, 03:50 PM)thxbb12 Wrote: [ -> ]IMO, what's really missing is a compact UWA prime, for instance a 8mm f2 or f2.8.
Also, a 40-150 f4 is too short. There is already a 40-150 f2.8 so what's the point?
Instead, a 50-250 f4 would be much more interesting and different from what's available.
But now you can have the holy f8 FF equivalent PRO trinity for MFT....
Well, Canon shouldn't be alone in the high aperture game, right? ;-)
600mm f/11
800mm f/11
100-500mm f/4.5-7.1
24-105mm f/4-7.1
100-400mm f/5.6-8
I'm sure that they will add a 18-35mm f/4.5-7.1 soon ;-)
Oh right, I forgot about the high dollar "Pro" Canon f8 L trinity, the $1100 24-70mm f8 L IS USM, the $1100 16-35mm f8 L IS USM and the $2000 70-300mm f8 L IS USM, the f8 pro workhorses. Thanks for pointing them out to me.