03-07-2024, 10:58 PM
davidmanze
03-08-2024, 10:27 AM
Well, it's a bit just in my book ...
Weak areas: corners at 24mm/purple fringing are probably it's biggest flaws
Nikon lists it at nearly €1,000 dollars .......
Weak areas: corners at 24mm/purple fringing are probably it's biggest flaws
Nikon lists it at nearly €1,000 dollars .......
03-08-2024, 12:50 PM
The corners at 24mm are quite weak but other than that it's descent.
It's actually pretty good for a superzoom.
Klaus, do you plan on reviewing the Tamron 24-200 f2.8-5.6?
It's supposed to be the best superzoom in that focal range.
It's actually pretty good for a superzoom.
Klaus, do you plan on reviewing the Tamron 24-200 f2.8-5.6?
It's supposed to be the best superzoom in that focal range.
03-09-2024, 07:10 AM
Could the soft corners at 24mm come from digital correction of massive distortions ?
03-09-2024, 08:29 AM
Nice to see a lens to get a score of 5... oh wait.
To think that a (gearhead) colleague, upon learning that I've come to own a Nikon Z9, suggested that I "sell all the Canon junk" and get this lens instead for everything.
To think that a (gearhead) colleague, upon learning that I've come to own a Nikon Z9, suggested that I "sell all the Canon junk" and get this lens instead for everything.
03-12-2024, 01:29 PM
BTW the Canon 24-240 looks quite a bit better, except of course the uncorrected distortion / vignetting figures that were a fair bit higher.