09-15-2016, 04:44 AM
Pages: 1 2
09-15-2016, 04:49 AM
Old ...
http://cweb.canon.jp/ef/lineup/tele-zoom...ec/mtf.png
vs
New ...
http://cweb.canon.jp/ef/lineup/tele-zoom...ec/mtf.png
Improved at 300mm
http://cweb.canon.jp/ef/lineup/tele-zoom...ec/mtf.png
vs
New ...
http://cweb.canon.jp/ef/lineup/tele-zoom...ec/mtf.png
Improved at 300mm
09-15-2016, 05:28 AM
If we consider the sales the best selling lenses aren't the best ones but the cheapest: 18-55 50f1.8 and 75-300, so those lenses are worth an upgrade.
They are upgrading 70-300 but IMHO the cheapo 75-300 deserves a second look, they are selling thousands maybe millions of it
They are upgrading 70-300 but IMHO the cheapo 75-300 deserves a second look, they are selling thousands maybe millions of it
09-15-2016, 06:12 AM
The 75-300mm was replaced with the 70-300mm. Now the 70-300mm is replaced with version II.
The one that they are selling a lot of: EF-S 55-250mm IS STM.
Looks like a solid upgrade!
Quite an improvement at 300mm (almost up to Sony FE 70-300mm G OSS and Canon 70-300mm L level), no rotating front element anymore, and much improved fast AF. For a very decent price.
The one that they are selling a lot of: EF-S 55-250mm IS STM.
Looks like a solid upgrade!
Quite an improvement at 300mm (almost up to Sony FE 70-300mm G OSS and Canon 70-300mm L level), no rotating front element anymore, and much improved fast AF. For a very decent price.
09-15-2016, 06:17 AM
Quote:The 75-300mm was replaced with the 70-300mm. Now the 70-300mm is replaced with version II.Thumbs up to Canon then.
The one that they are selling a lot of: EF-S 55-250mm IS STM.
Looks like a solid upgrade!
Quite an improvement at 300mm (almost up to Sony FE 70-300mm G OSS and Canon 70-300mm L level), no rotating front element anymore, and much improved fast AF. For a very decent price.
BTW the new EFs 18-55 STM is quite decent too compared to my old 18-55 I got as kit with my 300D, the difference is obvious.
09-15-2016, 06:19 AM
Yes indeed, the 18-55mm STM is quite a bit better optically.
09-15-2016, 06:21 AM
The cheapo 75-300 is irredeemable. If it is to be fixed, so much needs to be revised about it that you'll be looking at a lens about the price of this new 70-300. I'm wondering why they're still selling it as new - in kits with cheapest Rebels that would've benefitted more from the 55-250, to boot.
09-15-2016, 06:42 AM
I only see the 75-300mm being sold in fake kits with lost of other crap like $2 filters and crapy bags and what not. Not in Canon kits? Old lens stock being cleared in my opinion.
09-15-2016, 10:07 AM
the sample pic in this movie look nice in terms of bokeh quality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RL-xVSH0bh0
09-15-2016, 10:23 AM
The LCD implementation is not half bad, actually. Nice lens for a relatively nice price.
Nikon must be getting headaches from Canon (dual pixel sensors, PD AF image sensors in most DSLRs, a growing range of STM and nano USM lenses, a lot of technology to catch up to in the AF front).
Nikon must be getting headaches from Canon (dual pixel sensors, PD AF image sensors in most DSLRs, a growing range of STM and nano USM lenses, a lot of technology to catch up to in the AF front).
Pages: 1 2