regardless of its performance, 10mm is rather extreme and I prefer keeping this area for fisheye lenses, as Klaus said for landscape it is too wide for architecture it is doing a good job, however check the lights how they are distorted in this picture to the left and to the right the perspective effect is here and there's nothing that can be done about it
Nothing can be done about it? There is software to correct this kind of volumetric distortion for fish eye lenses, Fisheye-Hemi:
https://imadio.com
Pretty awesome product.
And there is software to correct this kind of distortion for linear corrected wide angle lenses , DXO Viewpoint 2 or DXO Pro 9:
http://www.dxo.com/us/photography/tutori...eformation
Not perfect correction, but it goes a long way.
its on my shopping list. I have also been eyeing the VM 15mm for use on a a7s. Really good value for around £250.
Unfortunately I don't have a A7 or £1k for the lens at the moment!
I would go not for OLD 12mm/15mm versions - it's likely that they run into reddish color shifts towards the borders.
Quote:If it wasn't for the tests, I would also go for the A7S (II). I, for one, don't know what to do with 42mp.
I agree, I found the resolution of my old 5D sufficient, and I can print 35"x20" from my X100t and have beautiful prints. I'm waiting for the price of the A7s to come down a bit; it's stubbornly sticking around the £800 mark on ebay for the last year with no sign of decreasing.
I love the sunstars from the VM 15mm
With "too extreme" I suppose you're talking about 10mm at FF, right?