01-05-2016, 10:41 AM
01-06-2016, 01:53 PM
Looks good. But of course doesn't have that "surprise bonus" anymore which the X-Pro 1 once had.
-- Markus
-- Markus
01-06-2016, 02:05 PM
Do you have any experience with the metabones speedbooster? I was on the edge to adapt some Nikon lenses but at the end decided to go with a normal "non-speedbooster" as it doesn't appear there's AF connectivity.
Is there more to look at the X-Pro2 than just more MP?
Is there more to look at the X-Pro2 than just more MP?
01-06-2016, 02:14 PM
Quote:Do you have any experience with the metabones speedbooster? I was on the edge to adapt some Nikon lenses but at the end decided to go with a normal "non-speedbooster" as it doesn't appear there's AF connectivity.Much better AF than version 1.
Is there more to look at the X-Pro2 than just more MP?
01-15-2016, 05:54 AM
Sorry, not interested. Who needs an optical viewfinder anyway? ;-)
01-15-2016, 07:19 AM
Thankfully after having the X100 I've grown out of the Fuji lust, where it also showed me it wasn't OVF I needed most but TTL VF.
Still, the X-Pro1 prices were already low and this can only push them lower for those who still want a play with the hybrid viewfinder.
Still, the X-Pro1 prices were already low and this can only push them lower for those who still want a play with the hybrid viewfinder.
02-15-2016, 08:17 PM
Why there is difference in the IQ on different sites?
I first looked on IR and the images had a grainy appearence. At Lenstip samples IQ is great.
I first looked on IR and the images had a grainy appearence. At Lenstip samples IQ is great.
02-15-2016, 08:33 PM
Quote:Why there is difference in the IQ on different sites?Probably the RAW conversion used?
I first looked on IR and the images had a grainy appearence. At Lenstip samples IQ is great.