![]() |
DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke (/showthread.php?tid=5489) |
RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - mike - 03-23-2023 AGREED! I generally look for articles for the same reasons. I'm still not convinced. Perhaps DPreview had some patents AZ wanted? I just can't imagine any company the size of AZ buying a review website just because it's cool or they could advertise on it. That makes no sense unless they had something else to offer. There has to be an ulterior motive. RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - borisbg - 03-23-2023 I think the original motive for Amazon to DPR was their visitor traffic, this allowed them push shopping links all over the place. It looked like good plan review, influence, sell... But as we know by now internet traffic is not a "thing" anymore on photography gear sites. And there is one more factor (here in US) sales taxes. B&H and Adorama have manged to help the buyer save on sales taxes. Amazon as seller is always in 8-9% disadvantage. RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - davidmanze - 03-24-2023 I've been visiting and contributing to DPR forums for nearly twelve years, ..... it's a photographer's institution .... then one fine day and it's gone ..... today's "must have" is tomorrows landfill ...... a shame indeed ....... Vivre Ukrain !! RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - photonius - 03-31-2023 (03-22-2023, 07:44 AM)Klaus Wrote: If DPR wasn't profitable and if it didn't contribute to Amazon in terms of cross-sales (which they tried), they had to pull the plug. Re: Pentax, LOL, indeed. (03-23-2023, 02:24 PM)thxbb12 Wrote: Totally agree. Yes, also agree, videos are such a waste of time. And producing a good video is also more time consuming than producing a good text. As to videos, I'm wondering what the future holds. Now Tiktok is all the rage, long videos are out, attention span is going down the tubes. Brainless masses are following clueless inflatulencers ... Idiocracy looms... RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - stoppingdown - 03-31-2023 Count me among those who definitely prefer articles to videos. RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - Kunzite - 04-01-2023 (03-22-2023, 07:44 AM)Klaus Wrote: BTW, who would have thought that Pentax and MFT will outlive DPR ;-)I'm surprised that MFT is still around, but Pentax? It's obvious they would survive the likes of DPR. And, they survived Canon EF and Nikon F as well. Just sayin' ![]() RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - Rover - 04-04-2023 I've seen some other sites that are new for me, but nothing compares to the good old Photozone anyway. :-) RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - thxbb12 - 04-08-2023 A "good" news at least: "we want to assure you that the content will remain available as an archive.". I'm glad they will actually keep it up as an archive. The content won't be lost at least :-) Source: https://www.dpreview.com/news/0507902613/dpreview-closure-an-update RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - mike - 04-08-2023 (04-08-2023, 07:31 PM)thxbb12 Wrote: A "good" news at least: "we want to assure you that the content will remain available as an archive.". They also said they're going to have new stories while they're archiving. Kind of sounds like someone may have expressed interest in the site... RE: DPReview is closing... And no it's not April's joke - Klaus - 04-08-2023 I don't think that there'll be a takeover. Reviewing stuff is a people business, and I reckon most of the staff has moved on. During the last years, Chris and Gordon were the primary drivers anyway. While I can understand why people have bashed Amazon for the decision, the site was surely a loss-maker. They had 12 people working for it. This just wasn't sustainable. There are now probably 20 relevant reviewers around camera/lens equipment. Back in the day, there were 5. The "reviewer community" is consuming its baseline at the moment. |