+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Micro-Four-Thirds (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Thread: Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-40mm f/2.8 review (/showthread.php?tid=1584)
Pages:
1
2
Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-40mm f/2.8 review - deejjjaaaa - 01-29-2014
Quote:AThe GX1 has an AA filter whereas the GH3/GX7 do not.
GH3 has AA filter and thick one
Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-40mm f/2.8 review - Klaus - 01-29-2014
The GH3 has certainly not a thick AA filter. I am absolutely sure about this.
Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-40mm f/2.8 review - Guest - 01-29-2014
Quote:The GH3 has certainly not a thick AA filter. I am absolutely sure about this.Because of the per-pixel-sharpness you observe? Anyhow, the GH3 definitely features an AA filter, while AFAIK Pana never said a word about the GX7 in this regard. How can one explain the puzzling DXOmark resolution data obtained with GX7? As said, it would have been interesting to see how the GX7 measures in the hands of PZ.
Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-40mm f/2.8 review - Guest - 02-04-2014
Quote:That´s the point, the resolution they got with the GX7 is so low - it´s actually hard to believe. Would have been nice to have a clarification from PZ on this.Here is the link to the disastrous dxomark data for the GX7:
http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Best-lenses-for-the-16-MPix-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GX7-Part-1/How-does-sharpness-compare-between-the-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GX7-and-the-Olympus-OM-D-E-M1
No GX7 owners around to comment? Sebbi?