+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Feedback wanted ... (/showthread.php?tid=2727)
Feedback wanted ... - Klaus - 01-06-2012
What do you think (about the table):
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/samsungnx/707"]http://www.opticallimits.com/samsungnx/707[/url]
Feedback wanted ... - joachim - 01-06-2012
Hi Klaus, a quick first reaction;
You have to work on your colours. The red writing of the links on the white-violet back-ground doesn't look good to me.
While for a handful of Samsung lenses this works, how will it look for the army of Nikon tests? Just having a table with hundreds of entries is not going to fly. Any plans on how to provide structure?
Feedback wanted ... - arvydas - 01-06-2012
Hi,
IMO it is quiet good until listed separately for every system. Arrangement by selected data is nice feature <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />A.
Feedback wanted ... - Klaus - 01-06-2012
[quote name='joachim' timestamp='1325847472' post='14387']
Hi Klaus, a quick first reaction;
You have to work on your colours. The red writing of the links on the white-violet back-ground doesn't look good to me.
While for a handful of Samsung lenses this works, how will it look for the army of Nikon tests? Just having a table with hundreds of entries is not going to fly. Any plans on how to provide structure?
[/quote]
That is a problem indeed.
It will not be possible anymore so separate primes and zooms within a manufacturer. It "just doesn't sort".
We will not have "hundreds" of tests except in the total overview list.
Feedback wanted ... - popo - 01-06-2012
I'm not keen on the text representation of the star ratings, which just looks messy. If it isn't too much work maybe create a dedicated graphic set for it?
Feedback wanted ... - Klaus - 01-06-2012
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1325852954' post='14401']
I'm not keen on the text representation of the star ratings, which just looks messy. If it isn't too much work maybe create a dedicated graphic set for it?
[/quote]
This is not meant to be the final version - just a concept.
Visual tuning will be applied, of course.
Feedback wanted ... - popo - 01-06-2012
Did I give the wrong sort of feedback? Still, that was the only thing that sprang to mind when I looked at it. Is ok for me other than that.
Playing with it a little more, I suspect it is sorting on the text string, not the effective rating score, so that would take some "tuning" too.
Feedback wanted ... - Guest - 01-06-2012
It is similar to the original database you had many years ago. I woudl actually prefer a bit more spacing between the lenses and marginally larger font.
I think what a lot of places do is first list zooms (or primes) then follow with primes (or zooms). I'm mixed as to whether primes/zoom should/should not be mixed.
Feedback wanted ... - Klaus - 01-06-2012
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1325854706' post='14407']
It is similar to the original database you had many years ago. I woudl actually prefer a bit more spacing between the lenses and marginally larger font.
I think what a lot of places do is first list zooms (or primes) then follow with primes (or zooms). I'm mixed as to whether primes/zoom should/should not be mixed.
[/quote]
Yes, this gave an outcry the last time I tried it. :-)
Sebastian came up with the idea of grouping zooms and primes - this would be possible.
However, I suspect that the sorting by name/or focal length will not be optimal because it will be sorted by string and not by number.
Feedback wanted ... - PuxaVida - 01-06-2012
Cool to have a sorting possibility... But the star ratings can be more readable. For example ***+ to **** instead of ***+ - ****... But I'm afraid then we loose the correct sorting possibility, right?
Anyhow, it will be a very valuable database... Thanks in advance.
Serkan