Opticallimits
Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - Printable Version

+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body (/showthread.php?tid=3256)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - mst - 05-26-2011

[quote name='Vieux loup' timestamp='1306427422' post='8834']

Great! I will try to wait, but there is a 16-35 sort of winking at me! What do you think Markus?

[/quote]



Well, the 16-35 does have its shortcomings (see the review), but in general it's nonetheless a lens to like. I just switched back to it myself. It's not the best wide angle zoom, optically, but I like the combination of wide angle and VR. PLus, it takes filters ... and doesn't flare like crazy <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />



-- Markus


Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - Steinar1 - 05-27-2011

[quote name='mst' timestamp='1306430005' post='8835']

Well, the 16-35 does have its shortcomings (see the review), but in general it's nonetheless a lens to like. I just switched back to it myself. It's not the best wide angle zoom, optically, but I like the combination of wide angle and VR. PLus, it takes filters ... and doesn't flare like crazy <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />



-- Markus

[/quote]



Well I don't think the 2 degrees are worth 500€ and I prefer having a filter opportunity and the piqué is still pretty good and it makes more sense as an all round street report lense. My mind is made up <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />


Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - Guest - 05-27-2011

[quote name='Vieux loup' timestamp='1306490972' post='8848']

Well I don't think the 2 degrees are worth 500€ and I prefer having a filter opportunity and the piqué is still pretty good and it makes more sense as an all round street report lense. My mind is made up <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />

[/quote]

It's 7.5 degrees <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' />


Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - Yakim - 05-27-2011

2 degrees in UWA terms is a lot.


Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - Steinar1 - 05-29-2011

So be it <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' /> , I ordered the 16-35! Wish me luck with it.


Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - Yakim - 05-29-2011

Good luck.


Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - Steinar1 - 06-09-2011

A little update. I have had and tried the 16-35 for a while now and find that it is for me he ideal street, city travel and reportage lens. In spite of its size, it gives me everything I want when visiting or reporting on a city and the filter option is a real plus when shooting water and landscapes. I use a Hoya PRO polarizer and the rendition is great. My flash covers the whole width and I am a happy camper with this one.


Choice of WA lens for FF Nikon body - frank - 06-10-2011

[quote name='Vieux loup' timestamp='1307619750' post='9095']

A little update. I have had and tried the 16-35 for a while now and find that it is for me he ideal street, city travel and reportage lens. In spite of its size, it gives me everything I want when visiting or reporting on a city and the filter option is a real plus when shooting water and landscapes. I use a Hoya PRO polarizer and the rendition is great. My flash covers the whole width and I am a happy camper with this one.

[/quote]



This is a lovely lens, you won't regret.



Frank