Nikon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D AF - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Nikon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D AF (/showthread.php?tid=3617) |
Nikon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D AF - ANNIES - 10-01-2010 few weeks ago you have a test for this lense to day its not in your list why ? mistake ? Nikon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D AF - mst - 10-01-2010 It sometimes happens that reviews are removed when there is serious doubt that the reviewed sample was not within specs. However, I don't see this here, I don't remember a review of this lens, nor do I find traces of such a review in our CMS. -- Markus Nikon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D AF - ANNIES - 10-02-2010 Yes I have see this test, some months ago. And I bought this lens after. But I've not printed I would be interested to the printed In French Forum CHASSEUR D’IMAGE it is cited : you very well noted that lenses manufacturer in 1998, 2006. In a page of your site it is compared Nikkor AF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 D (***-) good (***+) good (***-) very good (****-) significant (***) little distortions (****) significant (w/o) (***) little vignetting (w/o) (****) neutral some flare (***-) good (3.44) slow (**-) good (***) 142 Nikon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D AF - Brightcolours - 10-02-2010 [quote name='ANNIES' timestamp='1286013254' post='3446'] Yes I have see this test, some months ago. And I bought this lens after. But I've not printed I would be interested to the printed In French Forum CHASSEUR D’IMAGE it is cited : you very well noted that lenses manufacturer in 1998, 2006. In a page of your site it is compared [/quote] I do not remember seeing this particular lens tested on photozone, ANNIES. I think you must have seen it tested somewhere else. Nikon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D AF - exuvia - 10-02-2010 [quote name='ANNIES' timestamp='1286013254' post='3446'] Yes I have see this test, some months ago. And I bought this lens after. But I've not printed I would be interested to the printed In French Forum CHASSEUR D’IMAGE it is cited : you very well noted that lenses manufacturer in 1998, 2006. In a page of your site it is compared [/quote] Those data you pasted are about the Lens This is most likely spam content, a subjective evaluation made by the users. That is not a Photozone Test at all. |