Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX (/showthread.php?tid=3696) |
Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX - Klaus - 08-29-2010 Pretty impressive it seems ... [url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20100830_389903.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20100830_389903.html[/url] Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX - youpii - 08-29-2010 From the MTF curves, we can expect soft corners at 16mm, but still sharp on 2/3 of the frame. Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX - sloma_p - 08-30-2010 Not a bad bokeh for a WA zoom <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> And CAs seem to be a bit better controlled than in my 12-24/4. Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX - Bare - 08-31-2010 [quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1283094469' post='2308'] Pretty impressive it seems ... [url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20100830_389903.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20100830_389903.html[/url] [/quote] Yes, pretty impressive and great news is price in Japan, ebout 2x times than Nikkor 14-24 F2,8 or Canon 16-35 F2,8 II. [quote name='sloma_p' timestamp='1283204938' post='2352'] Not a bad bokeh for a WA zoom <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> And CAs seem to be a bit better controlled than in my 12-24/4. [/quote] 100% it has less CA than any other Tokina lens, it's because same glass which can be found in new Sigmas, FLD glass. Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 FX - Guest - 09-01-2010 As a concert-shooter I am very interested in this lens. Especially its performance wide-open. The 14-24 is out of budget unfortunately and the 17-35 doesn't perform well enough at 2.8 (and I am not that picky! I still use a beater 35/2) |