+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Canon EOS (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS (/showthread.php?tid=3727)
Pages:
1
2
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - Klaus - 08-16-2010
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/540-canon70300f4556doisff"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/540-canon70300f4556doisff[/url]
Could be a little better in relation to its price tag.
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - Guest - 08-16-2010
a little mistake in the price of its in-house competitor <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - popo - 08-16-2010
You put an extra 0 on the price of the non-DO lens <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> I don't think I'd pay $4500 for it.Will there be also an updated test on crop sensor?
I did get a DO for myself, pre-used so that the price was somewhat sane. The reason for choosing it over the non-DO version? So it would fit in my small camera bags <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> I have the 100-400L for when I don't care about size. The only other 300mm region lens I had at the time was the Tamron 18-270 but that felt worse on the long end (both on crop sensor of course).
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - Klaus - 08-16-2010
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1281987626' post='1821']
You put an extra 0 on the price of the non-DO lens <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> I don't think I'd pay $4500 for it.Will there be also an updated test on crop sensor?
I did get a DO for myself, pre-used so that the price was somewhat sane. The reason for choosing it over the non-DO version? So it would fit in my small camera bags <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> I have the 100-400L for when I don't care about size. The only other 300mm region lens I had at the time was the Tamron 18-270 but that felt worse on the long end (both on crop sensor of course).[/quote]
Thanks ... a 70-300 for 4500EUR may be a little over the top ... :-)
There'll be no update on APS-C this time. The lens is not all that interesting for the mainstream I think.
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - popo - 08-16-2010
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1281990028' post='1825']
Thanks ... a 70-300 for 4500EUR may be a little over the top ... :-)[/quote]
Then again, if they did a 70-300 f/2.8 for 4500EUR, I'd possibly be 1st in line <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - Guest - 08-17-2010
I wonder if Canon has given up on the DO design; also curious how long they spent working on the 400 and 70-300 designs prior to release. Hum. Oh well would be nice to see something new on the optical front.
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - Yakim - 08-17-2010
Silly price tag and ugly bokeh. Yikes.
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - wim - 08-17-2010
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1282048042' post='1838']
I wonder if Canon has given up on the DO design; also curious how long they spent working on the 400 and 70-300 designs prior to release. Hum. Oh well would be nice to see something new on the optical front.
[/quote]
I think they have. These multiple fresnel type lenses are great for making a lens a lot lighter and shorter, are fine when used with film, but on digital they require an expert hand at postprocessing - digital is just too sharp to obliterate the rendering side effects of these lenses.
The 70-300 DO was always praised over here as a stealth lens: it doesn't really look as long as it is, and it is black too <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.Kind regards, Wim
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - wim - 08-17-2010
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1282050888' post='1839']
Silly price tag and ugly bokeh. Yikes.
[/quote]
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> - well, it is a rather complicated and difficult technology to get it right...Kind regards, WIm
next PZ Lens Test Report - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM DO IS - Brightcolours - 08-17-2010
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1282048042' post='1838']
I wonder if Canon has given up on the DO design; also curious how long they spent working on the 400 and 70-300 designs prior to release. Hum. Oh well would be nice to see something new on the optical front.
[/quote]
Canon has filed a number of new patent applications for new DO lens designs. So, who knows, we may see a few more in the next few years?