Opticallimits
Slight mistake in Pany 12-60 f3.5-5.6 review - Printable Version

+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Micro-Four-Thirds (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Thread: Slight mistake in Pany 12-60 f3.5-5.6 review (/showthread.php?tid=4529)



Slight mistake in Pany 12-60 f3.5-5.6 review - thxbb12 - 10-01-2019

Hello Klaus,

There is a slight type in the Pany 12-60 review: https://opticallimits.com/m43/983_pana1260f3556

Dimensions are inverted. It says:

Dimensions (L x W) 71x66mm

But it should say:

Dimensions (L x W) 66x71mm

Cheers.


RE: Slight mistake in Pany 12-60 f3.5-5.6 review - Brightcolours - 10-01-2019

(10-01-2019, 12:50 PM)thxbb12 Wrote: Hello Klaus,

There is a slight type in the Pany 12-60 review: https://opticallimits.com/m43/983_pana1260f3556

Dimensions are inverted. It says:

Dimensions (L x W) 71x66mm
BBut it should say:

Dimensions (L x W) 66x71mm

Cheers.

Better write an email to Panasonic then:
H-FS12060E-Product_ImageGlobal-1_nl_nl_20160223.png


RE: Slight mistake in Pany 12-60 f3.5-5.6 review - thxbb12 - 10-01-2019

Wrong lens, I meant to say this for the Pany/Leica 12-60 2.8-4: https://opticallimits.com/m43/1007_leica1260f284

Instead of:
Dimensions (L x W) 68.4x86mm

It should be:
Dimensions (L x W) 86x68.4mm

Cheers.


RE: Slight mistake in Pany 12-60 f3.5-5.6 review - Brightcolours - 10-01-2019

That makes more sense Big Grin