Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced (/showthread.php?tid=4764) |
Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced - Klaus - 06-18-2020 https://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/contemporary/c020_100_400_5_63/ For E- & L-mount @ USD 950 Surprisingly it is a little different from the DSLR variant - but just as heavy. RE: Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced - miro - 06-19-2020 (06-18-2020, 11:33 PM)Klaus Wrote: https://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/contemporary/c020_100_400_5_63/ As reference - Canon RF 70-200/2,8 is 1200g / 1,070g w/o tripod mount. Keep in mind that Canon ware proud of achievement. Canon premium magnesium casting shaves few grams but Sigma contemporary is not so shabby. ANother ancor point is Canon EF 70-200 - weight 1460...1490g around all generations RE: Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced - Brightcolours - 06-19-2020 (06-19-2020, 06:47 AM)miro Wrote:What a strange comparison you try to draw there. Puzzling.(06-18-2020, 11:33 PM)Klaus Wrote: https://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/contemporary/c020_100_400_5_63/ To put things in perspective: The Sigma 100-400mm f5-6.3 weighs... 1140 grams. The Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 weighs 1380 grams. They are totally in line, weight wise, when you consider their max. aperture difference. RE: Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced - miro - 06-19-2020 (06-19-2020, 06:57 AM)Brightcolours Wrote:(06-19-2020, 06:47 AM)miro Wrote:What a strange comparison you try to draw there. Puzzling.(06-18-2020, 11:33 PM)Klaus Wrote: https://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/contemporary/c020_100_400_5_63/ I compare 1. RF vs RF lenses with different FL and aperture 2. RF vs EF same FL and max aperture Can you make conclusion based on 2 examples You are comparing 1. RF vs EF same aperture - Can I make concision based on your single example? RE: Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced - davidmanze - 06-19-2020 Christopher Frost has already reviewed the lens ....... no focus breathing ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MIyCMAfWwI&t=603s RE: Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced - Brightcolours - 06-19-2020 (06-19-2020, 07:27 AM)miro Wrote: I compareIf you want to think that somehow 100-400mm lenses for DSLRs should be not comparable to 100-400mm lenses for mirrorless, that your freedom. You did not compare 1. RF vs RF lenses with different FL and aperture 2. RF vs EF same FL and max aperture I did not compare 1. RF vs EF same aperture Another puzzling post? RE: Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary announced - Klaus - 06-19-2020 So the IS continues to be a bid ... meh. |