My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Thread: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 (/showthread.php?tid=5006) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - Brightcolours - 03-10-2021 (03-10-2021, 07:07 PM)davidmanze Wrote:(03-10-2021, 06:52 PM)Brightcolours Wrote:I think the shortest extension available is by loosening the lens mount"s screws(03-10-2021, 03:30 PM)davidmanze Wrote: Thanks stoppingdown The reason I ask is because for instance a 12mm extension tube will probably already be too much for 14mm, putting the focus plane at "infinity" already past the front element. (03-10-2021, 01:06 PM)stoppingdown Wrote: Ok... here we go: It probably should be "In the field..", in English. I would have liked to see how it works (result wise) on FF, but it does seem to like being on your APS-C Sony. My Voigtlander 20mm f3.5 I bought for FF for what you use this Tamron for on APS-C: close ups. But the Voigtlander is not suitable, due to heavy astigmatism at close up distances. Some nice images in the review. RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - davidmanze - 03-10-2021 The reason I ask is because for instance a 12mm extension tube will probably already be too much for 14mm, putting the focus plane at "infinity" already past the front element. OK, I just tried a 12mm extension tube on the Samayng 14mm ...... and even with the subject touching the front element ....... it's still little blurred ... but not by much !! 6mm would probably be about right ..... maybe they exist as dumb versions ?? There is an original Nikon 8mm extension tube in Australia for 40 euros + postage ..... and I found a 5.8mm one as part of an expensive manual set (€99+post) ....... ....... maybe I'll give it a miss ..... RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - stoppingdown - 03-10-2021 "In the field": right, thanks: fixed. For what concerns extension tubes and the 14mm, I recall that some time ago I quickly tried my shortest extension tube (10mm) with the Samyang 12mm and no way. With wide angle lenses I fear that the required extension is by far smaller than what can be achieved with a tube. That's why when I first experimented with the fish-eye I had to use a thin shim made of cardboard, inserted between the lens mount and the lens body. RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - wim - 03-10-2021 Very nice, actually! And those pictures, and the insertion of a few Italian words and names, make me long for a visit to Italy. I stayed there for my studies, 3 long summers, about 45 km north of Genoa (edge of the Piemonte Basin) and it was great. A few years ago I was in Firenze (Florence), on an invitation of someone who is involved in one of my (many) other hobbies . Kindest regards, Wim RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - stoppingdown - 03-11-2021 Thanks Wim. |