+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Canon EOS (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III (/showthread.php?tid=666)
Pages:
1
2
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Brightcolours - 08-17-2016
These are going to be announced for Photokina.
The lenses speak for themselves, the 5D mk IV will be a 30.4mp camera with a similar AF system as the 1D-X mk II, dual pixel CMOS, touch screen, 4K, 1080p 60 FPS, 720P 120 FPS, 7 FPS continuous shooting, anti flicker system, built in WiFi/GPS/NFC, 422 8 bit 500mpbs MJPEG (some won't like the big files this will give) .
As expected, the 5D mkIV is more geared to video than the 5Ds.
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - davidmanze - 08-17-2016
Hmmm, I was thinking sports AF
then, with 30Mps 
then hmm, 7 Fps :wacko:
have they missed a trick by a couple of FPS? A 30Mps semi sports camera!
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Klaus - 08-17-2016
The 5D IV is certainly a much more reasonable offering than the 5Ds ®.
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Brightcolours - 08-17-2016
The camera has shed a bit of weight:
mk IV: 150.7 x 116.4 x 75.9mm, 890 grams
mk III: 152mm × 116.4mm × 76.4mm, 945 grams
Photos:
http://nokishita-camera.blogspot.nl/2016/08/eos-5d-mark-iv.html
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Brightcolours - 08-18-2016
Images and some details of the two updated lenses:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://nokishita-camera.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/blog-post_18.html
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - toni-a - 08-18-2016
the question I am asking is should I sell my 24-105 and get the newer one ?
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Klaus - 08-18-2016
Quote:the question I am asking is should I sell my 24-105 and get the newer one ?
Well, the old 24-105mm L isn't super-hot
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Brightcolours - 08-19-2016
And the new one may be improved, but only tests will tell.
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Brightcolours - 08-19-2016
Rumoured specs EF 16-35mm f2.8 L IS USM III:
- 16 elements in 11 groups (old: 16 elements in 12 groups)
- 3 aspherical, 2 UD elements (old: 3 aspherical, 2 UD elements)
- 790 grams (old: 640 grams)
- 17 elements in 12 groups (old: 18 elements in 13 groups)
- 4 aspherical elements (old: 3 aspherical, 1 UD)
- 795 grams (old: 690 grams)
- 10 blade aperture (weird??)
EOS 5D mk IV, EF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II, EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Rover - 08-19-2016
Pretty beefy... looks like the 16-35/4 is going to be a compact option after all (being 25 grams lighter than the 16-35/2.8 II). By the way, has the 17-40 finally met its end?