just got Canon 10-18, which ultrawide to keep? - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Canon EOS (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: just got Canon 10-18, which ultrawide to keep? (/showthread.php?tid=890) |
just got Canon 10-18, which ultrawide to keep? - toni-a - 02-20-2016 Just found a mint condition second hand Canon 10-18 for just 180$ didn't hesitate. Now since I have both worlds APS-C and full frame. Will do my tryouts to decide which one to keep. In favor or Tokina 16-28: Fast lens, less sensor noise since full frame. It is optically by far the best choice only if it didn't weigh 950 grams a true burden for hiking, however for weddings and parties it's simply amazing. In favor of the Canon: Practical, lightweight, compact, can take filters, no protruding front element less than one quarter the weight of the tokina... Just to mention also got 8mm fisheye quite funny lens Most likely I will be keeping both, unless I have a very decent offer for the tokina just got Canon 10-18, which ultrawide to keep? - backcountryskier - 02-21-2016 The answer is easy. Your wife bought you the 16-28 as a present, so that's the one you keep. just got Canon 10-18, which ultrawide to keep? - Rover - 02-21-2016 Keep both, what's the problem? Then just take the one suitable for whichever camera you're using at the moment. just got Canon 10-18, which ultrawide to keep? - toni-a - 02-28-2016 I am trying today the EFS 10-18 to see how good it and it can match the 16-28, however I got a pleasant surprise from my 8mm fisheye..., flare spots are a slight problem, but I think it is avoidable |