+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: A last DxoMark reviews the SEL1670Z and the SEL18105 (/showthread.php?tid=989)
A last DxoMark reviews the SEL1670Z and the SEL18105 - stoppingdown - 11-23-2015
http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Sony-Zeiss-Vario-Tessar-T-E-16-70mm-F4-ZA-OSS-lens-review-Balanced-performer
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Sony/Sony-E-PZ-18-105mm-F4-G-OSS
Nothing new, after such a long time: the former is good, but not worth the (original) price tag; the latter can compete in some areas, but has lots of geometric distortion.
A last DxoMark reviews the SEL1670Z and the SEL18105 - josa - 11-23-2015
Well, it is Sony...
A last DxoMark reviews the SEL1670Z and the SEL18105 - Brightcolours - 11-23-2015
Well, it is DXO... (I'm not not putting any trust in their lens test findings)
A last DxoMark reviews the SEL1670Z and the SEL18105 - Klaus - 11-23-2015
The Zeiss 55mm has scored 15mp vs 8mp for the Zeiss 16-70mm - on the NEX7/A6000.
Says it all I think. Not sure where they see balance here.
A last DxoMark reviews the SEL1670Z and the SEL18105 - Brightcolours - 11-24-2015
DXO scored the EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS USM II the same as the EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS USM. DXO mark scores the EF 16-35mm f4 L IS USM not better than the EF 17-40mm f4 L USM. DXO mark scores the EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM II very high wide open and worse stopped down.
Says all about their reliability I think.
A last DxoMark reviews the SEL1670Z and the SEL18105 - borisbg - 11-24-2015
And I am surprised that their i-Lego-block didn't score better tha Sony a7