06-20-2013, 07:01 PM
Well, thanx for the encouraging replies, I just thought that for that money, the results should be a tad better...
|
06-20-2013, 07:01 PM
Well, thanx for the encouraging replies, I just thought that for that money, the results should be a tad better...
06-20-2013, 09:26 PM
This is just physics and has nothing to do with the lens.
f/16 is a no go on MFT.
08-12-2013, 03:40 AM
I wonder if it makes sense to test some lenses from Nikon or Canon on a MFT camera. I think it would be nice to compare e.g. Nikkor 85mm f1.8 with the Oly 75mm f1.8.
08-12-2013, 08:32 PM
Quote:I wonder if it makes sense to test some lenses from Nikon or Canon on a MFT camera. I think it would be nice to compare e.g. Nikkor 85mm f1.8 with the Oly 75mm f1.8. I think the usability aspects of a 85/1.8 G-Nikkor on a mFT cam make such a combination loose a lot of attraction. AF lenses make most sense on a body that can drive them. Also you loose aperture integration into the camera. Would clearly be a niche product. But these are my 0.02 $€£ - lets see what the PZ-Crew think.
enjoy
08-14-2013, 08:54 AM
I'm afraid that the manufacturers have to give us a break before looking into this.
And I don't see that happen I'm afraid ...
08-29-2013, 11:10 AM
dpreview has published an interesting article which suggests that the 75/1.8 may have been designed by Sigma. I am really starting to wonder what is going on at Sigma these days - lens designer doping?
![]() http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/08/29/...=title_0_0 |