Not flawless but hey - for 200USD this is a steal if you are on a budget
https://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha...sans12f28e
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
It took many years for me to realise that "albeit" a contraction of "all be it" is. A disconnect between hearing and reading english.
How would you compare it to the Samyang 12mm f/2?
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Dunno - never touched the Samyang.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
My idea of "quite good" may be a bit different from this...
https://opticallimits.com/images/8Reviews/lenses/7artisans_12_28e/mtf.png
... But hey, it's a nice "left field" review. If I had been actively using E mount I would've gone for the Sony 10-18 but still...
I reckon it is a question of how you look at this - the peak performance is roughly on par with the Touit and the Sony 10-18mm.
And I didn't say excellent nor very good anyway ... ;-)
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Is the native Sony option (16mm plus wide converter giving you 12mmf2.8) that bad it isn't even mentioned, the combo was reviewed her at PZ.
Despite owning the combo, I used it once and that was the first week I bought it.
(09-15-2019, 08:11 PM)toni-a Wrote: Is the native Sony option (16mm plus wide converter giving you 12mmf2.8) that bad it isn't even mentioned, the combo was reviewed her at PZ.
Despite owning the combo, I used it once and that was the first week I bought it.
Yes, catastrophic performance.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji