So, we now expect a Tokina to be the same price as a stop faster and much more glass containing Sigma Art lens? Or be more expensive than a faster Nikkor?
(04-19-2018, 05:42 AM)Brightcolours Wrote: (04-18-2018, 09:14 PM)Klaus Wrote: The Tokina is half the weight and length of the Sigma lens ...
As much as I like Sigma lenses these days - regarding its "extension tube" it's quite pathetic really.
My point was: an unjustified price for a 3rd party lens in today's pricing landscape.
And about the size and weight... Of course it is, that is the norm anyway with lenses that are a stop faster 
And on the tube... It is not an extension tube (lens does not focus closer), but rather a mirrorbox-replacement-sans-mirror, or integrated adapter.
Make a guess why I put the "extension tube" in quotation marks ... ;-)
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Did Tokina use the same optical design as the MF version of the lens? Lenstip shows that resolution is good, but vignetting is quite high.