• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Our first 1 star review is on the horizon ...
#11
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1313087367' post='10640']

No, sorry ... the 20/1.8 hasn't even seen a test chart, yet <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />



-- Markus

[/quote]



Hmmh, I just noticed that the 3* verdict in the APS-C section is stretching things a little.
  Reply
#12
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1313087541' post='10641']

Hmmh, I just noticed that the 3* verdict in the APS-C section is stretching things a little.

[/quote]



It will definitely be rated lower on the D7000.



-- Markus



P.S.:that should be enough hints now <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />
Editor
opticallimits.com

  Reply
#13
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1313087656' post='10642']

It will definitely be rated lower on the D7000.



-- Markus



P.S.:that should be enough hints now <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />

[/quote]

Come on, the voigtlander 20mm f3.5 SL II is actually quite a lovely lens on FF.
  Reply
#14
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1313089284' post='10644']

Come on, the voigtlander 20mm f3.5 SL II is actually quite a lovely lens on FF.

[/quote]



A [url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/504-voigtlander20f35eosff?start=1"]2.5 star lens[/url], actually <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  Reply
#15
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1313077950' post='10631']

Looking at Markus' sample images it would probably be a 2-3* lens on APS-C but it's a full format test. Actually it is quite easy to guess. Which lenses are optically the most challenging ? From a real world perspective this applies only to one type of lenses.

It's not an exotic, BTW, and can be purchased for multi-hundred EUR/$.

[/quote]





[quote name='mst' timestamp='1313087367' post='10640']

No, sorry ... the 20/1.8 hasn't even seen a test chart, yet <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />



-- Markus

[/quote]



If it's not an economic high-speed ultra-wide then it perhaps a wide-to-tele super-zoom?
/Dave

http://dave9t5.zenfolio.com
  Reply
#16
Nikon 24 - 120 VR <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />?
  Reply
#17
Nikon 14mm f2.8D?
  Reply
#18
[quote name='[PB]' timestamp='1313127560' post='10659']

Nikon 14mm f2.8D?

[/quote]



Correct brand, wrong lens.
  Reply
#19
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1313128215' post='10660']

Correct brand, wrong lens.

[/quote]



AF or MF?
  Reply
#20
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1313128967' post='10661']

AF or MF?

[/quote]



AF. With the exception of the tilt-shift lenses, I won't be reviewing Nikon MF lenses for another while.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)