[Brightcolours]

Oh, so it is a Nikon. Then it is the 18-35mm f3.5-4.5 ED which has no resolution on the edges whatsoever, crazy high CA and very high distortion?

[PuxaVida]

[quote name='mst' timestamp='1313129658' post='10663']

AF. With the exception of the tilt-shift lenses, I won't be reviewing Nikon MF lenses for another while.



-- Markus

[/quote]



Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D?

[mst]

[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1313130328' post='10666']

Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D?

[/quote]



Already reviewed <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />



-- Markus

[mst]

[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1313130154' post='10665']

Oh, so it is a Nikon. Then it is the 18-35mm f3.5-4.5 ED which has no resolution on the edges whatsoever, crazy high CA and very high distortion?

[/quote]



Bingo! <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />



-- Markus

[Guest]

Maybe a Fisheye lens?

[Guest]

[quote name='Robbert' timestamp='1313130731' post='10669']

Maybe a Fisheye lens?

[/quote]



Oh dear! Missed the "hit" of Brightcolours... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />

[froeschle]

[...] 18-35mm f3.5-4.5 ED [...]

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1835.htm

[PuxaVida]

[quote name='froeschle' timestamp='1313135816' post='10676']

[url="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1835.htm"]http://www.kenrockwe.../nikon/1835.htm[/url]

[/quote]



Making partial quotes from reviews is always a contraversial issue, but come on...:



"This 18-35mm pretty much does the same thing as the [url="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1735.htm"]17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S[/url], in plastic with more distortion, but with slightly better sharpness, for a lot less money. "



A meticulous (!!) review for a wide angle on FX...





Serkan

[arvydas]

[quote name='arv' timestamp='1313126981' post='10658']

Nikon 24 - 120 VR <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />?

[/quote]



So I guess my bet is for [url="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=620&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=3&LensComp=617&CameraComp=614&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=1&APIComp=3"]1/2 star[/url] <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

A.

[mst]

[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1313138184' post='10679']

"This 18-35mm pretty much does the same thing as the [url="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1735.htm"]17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S[/url], in plastic with more distortion, but with slightly better sharpness, for a lot less money. "

[/quote]



I can only guess that he had a poor copy of the 17-35/2.8



-- Markus