NEX:
NEX 5N: http://www.sony.co.uk/hub/nex-compact-camera-system/range/nex-5n
NEX 7: http://www.sony.co.uk/hub/nex-compact-camera-system/range/nex-7
Alpha:
SLT A65: http://www.sony.co.uk/product/dsi-body-and-1-lens/slt-a65vk
SLT A77: http://www.sony.co.uk/product/dsi-body-and-1-lens/slt-a77vq
And possibly the most interesting thing - the NEX-Alpha SLT adapter does really exist:
LA-EA2: http://www.sony.co.uk/product/dsa-other-accessories/la-ea2
NEXes:
coating on Optical Filter and ultrasonic vibration mechanism
Not for the SLTs it seems
I guess Nex-7 and A77 share the same viewfinder (technology)... Very tempting...
Serkan
NEX-7 + LA-EA2 = truly modular system? Tempting, pity it's so expensive <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/unsure.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':unsure:' />
[quote name='Lomskij' timestamp='1314170977' post='10901']
NEX-7 + LA-EA2 = truly modular system?
[/quote]
Not so sure about it. The image on dpr with LA-EA2 and the large lens (85/1.4?) doesn't look too tempting. I can imagine that the lack of weight at the rear end makes the whole setup very unconvenient to hold.
DPR posted sample images which are based on a production unit of the A77. I don't know if the firmware is final and what potential was left out by choosing camera default settings for JPGs. However, the images posted almost look like lenstip samples, they lack sharpness and that 24 MP sensor seems to show even more noise than expected.
I seriously hope that there is a lot more detail in the images that can be revealed with a good RAW converter. The Nex-7 looks like a camera that I have the impression many wished mirrorless cameras should have been from the beginning.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
IR has images
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA77/AA77A.HTM
but I am not sure why they are only comparing it with FF models.
08-24-2011, 08:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-24-2011, 08:34 AM by mst.)
Well, they are comparing it with other 20+ MP cameras, which makes some sense IMO.
However, the samples overthere look very poor, too.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1314174856' post='10906']
Well, they are comparing it with other 20+ MP cameras, which makes some sense IMO.
However, the samples overthere look very poor, too.
-- Markus
[/quote]
What? Should they have compared D90 with D700 since both are 12 MPs?
It doesn't make any "sense"
And what's 645D doing there? That's 40MP sensor.
They need to fix that page and put other APSC cameras on the page.
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1314174856' post='10906']
However, the samples overthere look very poor, too.
-- Markus
[/quote]
No, the studio shots, especially at lower ISOs, are fine.
A77 ISO 100
http://216.18.212.226/PRODS/AA77/FULLRES/AA77hSLI00050NR2D.JPG
D7000 ISO 100
http://216.18.212.226/PRODS/D7000/FULLRES/D7000hSLI00100_NR2D.JPG
[quote name='Sathe Wild' timestamp='1314175723' post='10907']
What? Should they have compared D90 with D700 since both are 12 MPs?
It doesn't make any "sense"
And what's 645D doing there? That's 40MP sensor.
They need to fix that page and put other APSC cameras on the page.
[/quote]
The format to compare to is actually meaningless. The pricing must be the leading aspect.
