• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > sample gallery: Canon EF 8-15mm f/4 USM L Fisheye
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,103

Reputation: 49
#1
08-25-2011, 04:47 PM
Seems to be a very nice lens. Marginal flare even with direct sunlight.



[url="http://photozone.smugmug.com/Reviews/canon815f4"]http://photozone.smugmug.com/Reviews/canon815f4[/url]
  Reply
popo
All-Star
*****
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,340

Reputation: 0
#2
08-25-2011, 05:05 PM
Distortion and vignetting looks rather high? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' /> Of course I'm not serious. This is definitely on my wish list, right after I get a 5D3 to use it on... it's that or the Sigma primes...
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  Reply
anyscreenamewilldo
Unregistered
 
#3
08-25-2011, 08:32 PM
nice pictures, thank you . . .

. . . just one thing . . . isn't this way of looking at samples preferable to the way the samples are shown at the actual lens test site . . . means that if one is just nosy (or lacking the essential body for the lens maybe?) it is possible to look at a less than full size sample first rather than the whole bigness of it all thus saving bandwidth?? . . . or am i wrong . . . again <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Sad' />
  Reply
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,103

Reputation: 49
#4
08-25-2011, 08:40 PM
[quote name='anyscreenamewilldo' timestamp='1314304351' post='11005']

nice pictures, thank you . . .

. . . just one thing . . . isn't this way of looking at samples preferable to the way the samples are shown at the actual lens test site . . . means that if one is just nosy (or lacking the essential body for the lens maybe?) it is possible to look at a less than full size sample first rather than the whole bigness of it all thus saving bandwidth?? . . . or am i wrong . . . again <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Sad' />

[/quote]



The images are hosted at smugmug.com. As of now we've no bandwidth issues although "the rest" is taking 2TB per month at the moment.

A server upgrade is due in late November I guess.
  Reply
Yakim
Unregistered
 
#5
08-31-2011, 09:44 PM
Technological Tour-de-force. Well done Canon.
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)