[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1349205448' post='20468']
... and have a look whether you learned something over the last years ....
![[Image: wink.gif]](http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
I've attached the MTFs of a lens. Which one and what do you see here ?
This is not (really) a joke.
![[Image: cool.gif]](http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)
[/quote]
Prime or zoom?
My first thoughts were, in order:
Sigma 30/1.4
Canon 28/1.8
Sigma 28/1.8
Sigma 24/1.8
Pentax FA43/1.9
Sony 16/2.8
But none really match, maybe the Canon 28/1.8 has the most similar characteristic with the wavy correction at the corners.
/Dave
http://dave9t5.zenfolio.com
Interesting. A pancake?
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
For fun I would say Canon 50mm f/1.0, but I doubt the centre resolution would be so high!
Interesting action in the border/corner region there. Badly corrected spherical aberration?
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
10-02-2012, 08:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-02-2012, 08:11 PM by Klaus.)
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1349208577' post='20474']
Ah, ok.
MTF not corrected for field curvature? Of a lens with strong FC?
-- Markus
[/quote]
Yes
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1349208634' post='20475']
Yes
[/quote]
And the lens is ?
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1349210092' post='20476']
And the lens is ?
[/quote]
OEM?
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
' />
![[Image: rolleyes.gif]](http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
