• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > tips and advice retaking the same picture after 11 years
#11
Quote:Is there something wrong with your keyboard, Dave?


 

It's making me dizzy.
 

    Nothing at all ........try specsavers.......
  Reply
#12
Quote:Hi Dave, in fact I did plenty of adjustments in photoshop for this photo, the one you see here is the raw converted without post processing, if interested I can gladly send you the RAW picture.

 

 
 

  Please do.....let's give it a go...........there seems to be a bit too much negativity here tody........Dropbox would be great!...........

 

............the first shot!

  Reply
#13
Well, for sure you take care we're not running out of points ...........................................................................................

 

Tongue

 

[Image: duckw100x18.gif]

  Reply
#14
Quote:there seems to be a bit too much negativity here tody.....!
Actually, no one is being overly negative about the image.


If you a beginner then the shot is OK. But if you have been shooting for another 11 years and you don't know what is "wrong" with the image then I would have to wonder.......


If people want I can say exactly what the problems are but as I said in my original post it is a long list.
  Reply
#15
Quote:Actually, no one is being overly negative about the image.


If you a beginner then the shot is OK. But if you have been shooting for another 11 years and you don't know what is "wrong" with the image then I would have to wonder.......


If people want I can say exactly what the problems are but as I said in my original post it is a long list.
 

   With that light it's not always easy to get a the right exposure straight off the bat................let's see what we can get out of it, we haven't a lot to lose!
  Reply
#16
Quote:   With that light it's not always easy to get a the right exposure straight off the bat................let's see what we can get out of it, we haven't a lot to lose!
 

You don't understand the problem. Maybe you are not a landscape/seascape photographer.

 

The image just does not work. It doesn't work because there are some fundamental things that have not been considered.

 

A classical landscape/seascape shot is almost always made up of 3 components:

- Foreground

- Midground

- Background

 

Each component needs to "work" individually/independently as well as collectively.

 

None of the components in the image in question work in any way. Sorry for being so blunt.

 

I could go into detail what all the problems are but massaging the original RAW file is a dead-end.
  Reply
#17
Quote:You don't understand the problem. Maybe you are not a landscape/seascape photographer.

 

The image just does not work. It doesn't work because there are some fundamental things that have not been considered.

 

A classical landscape/seascape shot is almost always made up of 3 components:

- Foreground

- Midground

- Background

 

Each component needs to "work" individually/independently as well as collectively.

 

None of the components in the image in question work in any way. Sorry for being so blunt.

 

I could go into detail what all the problems are but massaging the original RAW file is a dead-end.

 

 
 

  Hmmm!......................you really know how to encourage folk to post their photos!

  Reply
#18
Come on, Dave, it's not far from what I see in the picture as well. I'm not learning by hearing "nice picture". If I want to improve I have to cope with critic as well - and Studor13's critic was far away from unfriendly.
  Reply
#19
Firstly, I want to say that I am not criticizing Toni’s current photographic skills because the original shot was over 10 years ago.


I have far worse shots than this from 2006.


But if you recall my first post I said that Toni was better off just enjoying the scenery and sea air rather than re-working this composition.


The main reason I said this was because although I live near the mountains I am familiar with this type of coastline. It is near impossible to get a decent foreground anchor to work with.


In the original image, one part of the foreground is quite nice but the rock formation on the right is the type that we have all over the place here (and down the Croatian coast). You can not make these types of rocks in the foreground “work”.  They just don’t have the structure/fibre to make themselves look good in a photo.


There are other technical issues but the main problem is that it is very difficult to get a seascape shot to work if you don’t have a good foreground to start with and that your background is combined with a town AND a sky.


You are better off to have no foreground but just have a bit of water, town and sky. This way, the town lights are bigger and brighter and there will be more details in the structure of the buildings.

  Reply
#20
If the weather helps will be redoing this picture saturday and maybe tomorrow afternoon, just before sunset the light is pink/orange and that might be interesting for the snow, will retry to take it without the stony foreground.

 

Negative or positive feedback, it doesn't matter, it is all about sharing the knowledge and improving, this was taken when I was at my beginnings with digital photography, in fact this set was the second time I shoot RAW, I had my first DSLR for barely one month, great memories, let's see how will I improve with my shooting. will give you feedback as soon as I retake the shot,

  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)