few weeks ago you have a test for this lense
to day its not in your list
why ?
mistake ?
It sometimes happens that reviews are removed when there is serious doubt that the reviewed sample was not within specs.
However, I don't see this here, I don't remember a review of this lens, nor do I find traces of such a review in our CMS.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
Yes I have see this test, some months ago.
And I bought this lens after.
But I've not printed
I would be interested to the printed
In French Forum CHASSEUR D’IMAGE it is cited : you very well noted that lenses manufacturer in 1998, 2006.
In a page of your site it is compared
Nikkor AF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 D
(***-) good
(***+) good
(***-) very good
(****-) significant
(***) little distortions
(****) significant (w/o)
(***) little vignetting (w/o)
(****) neutral some flare
(***-) good
(3.44) slow
(**-) good
(***) 142
[quote name='ANNIES' timestamp='1286013254' post='3446']
Yes I have see this test, some months ago.
And I bought this lens after.
But I've not printed
I would be interested to the printed
In French Forum CHASSEUR D’IMAGE it is cited : you very well noted that lenses manufacturer in 1998, 2006.
In a page of your site it is compared
[/quote]
I do not remember seeing this particular lens tested on photozone, ANNIES. I think you must have seen it tested somewhere else.
[quote name='ANNIES' timestamp='1286013254' post='3446']
Yes I have see this test, some months ago.
And I bought this lens after.
But I've not printed
I would be interested to the printed
In French Forum CHASSEUR D’IMAGE it is cited : you very well noted that lenses manufacturer in 1998, 2006.
In a page of your site it is compared
[/quote]
Those data you pasted are about the Lens This is most likely spam content, a subjective evaluation made by the users. That is not a Photozone Test at all.
regards
Vitantonio Dell'Orto
www.exuviaphoto.com
www.sarnavandrarhem.com