[chrismiller]

er, yes. e-mount... I think I would prefer a fuji test personally for the 12mm.

[Brightcolours]

er, yes. e-mount... I think I would prefer a fuji test personally for the 12mm.

Over E-mount for sure, as those are being done on the "broken" nex-7.

[chrismiller]

I wonder if the new a6300 will have any edge issues...

[Sahib7]

I'm still waiting for the 18-135mm review.

Anything new yet?

[Klaus]

It's just a matter of priorities.

Canon, Nikon and Sony are keeping this site up and running ...

[Sahib7]

Has the review been canceled or is it still on your list?

But reading your conclusion gives me the feeling that I should skip this lens anyway...l

[thxbb12]

And which lenses do you think are the gems ?

 

I think the gems are mostly primes:

• 14 f2.8
  
• 16 f1.4
  
• 23 f1.4
  
• 56 f1.2
  
• 90 f2
  

And maybe these 2 zooms:

• 10-24 f4
  
• 50-140 f2.8
  

Although the 35 f1.4 didn't fare that well in the tests I find my copy to be better sharpness-wise than any other primes I have (meaning 14, 23 f1.4 and 23 f2, and 56).

[Rover]

Don't forget the 100-400.

[JJ_SO]

Hardly a "gem" - just the only lens beyond 140 mm around for Fuji  in terms of speed and sharpness I can imagine some improvements. But for sure, it's not worse than any current 150-600 on FF. Not much worse.

[Rover]

Hardly a "gem" - just the only lens beyond 140 mm around for Fuji  in terms of speed and sharpness I can imagine some improvements. But for sure, it's not worse than any current 150-600 on FF. Not much worse.

Uh, I thought there's a couple of 50(ish) to 200(ish) zooms in that stable and... I think Klaus had only the warm words to speak about the 100-400.