• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > New Sigma lenses on the horizon
#11
As long as we are talking sigma what ever became of the 85f1.4. Did it actually get released and was it anything special ?
  Reply
#12
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1297257721' post='5999']

As long as we are talking sigma what ever became of the 85f1.4. Did it actually get released and was it anything special ?

[/quote]



It is released. In fact I ordered one today.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  Reply
#13
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1297257721' post='5999']

As long as we are talking sigma what ever became of the 85f1.4. Did it actually get released and was it anything special ?

[/quote]

It is a good one

http://www.lenstip.com/277.11-Lens_review-Sigma_85_mm_f_1.4_EX_DG_HSM_Summary.html
  Reply
#14
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1297260544' post='6001']

It is a good one

http://www.lenstip.com/277.11-Lens_review-Sigma_85_mm_f_1.4_EX_DG_HSM_Summary.html

[/quote]



IMHO wide open sharpness is just that: Good. Not more.
  Reply
#15
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1297173767' post='5962']

Hmmm.. what's new?... The [url="http://www.sigmaphoto.com/news/sigma-corporation-announces-five-new-lenses-three-new-cameras-at-pma-2010"]"FLD" glass[/url], which is actually not a fluorite glass bu claimed to have the same performance (with affordable price). Makes me think of the Sigma "APO"s...



At the same adress, the FLD glass is also clamied to have very high light transmission. I'm afraid, these 4 FLD glasses will not be utilized by the max aperture of the lens...



Serkan

[/quote]



FLD was used in the 70-200 OS but it still perform worse than the Canon 70-200 IS II.



http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sigma_70-200_2p8_os_c16/
  Reply
#16
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1297288255' post='6009']

FLD was used in the 70-200 OS but it still perform worse than the Canon 70-200 IS II.

[/quote]

But [url="http://www.lenstip.com/263.1-Lens_review-Sigma_70-200_mm_f_2.8_EX_DG_APO_OS_HSM-Introduction.html"]it performs verry well[/url] and not so much behind a [url="http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=obiektywu&test_ob=270"]new Canon[/url] in terms of IQ and surely beter than old [url="http://www.lenstip.com/index.html?producent=26&obiektyw=470&typ=0&moc=0"]Canon 70-200 2,8[/url].



[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1297288118' post='6008']

IMHO wide open sharpness is just that: Good. Not more.

[/quote]

And with tha 'good' shapness it's still eneough to be on par with 2,5x times more expensive Canon 85 L
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)