05-08-2011, 11:00 AM
Hi
Do you plan to review the TOKINA 35mm F/2,8 Macro ?
Do you plan to review the TOKINA 35mm F/2,8 Macro ?
TOKINA 35mm F/2,8 Macro
|
05-08-2011, 11:00 AM
Hi
Do you plan to review the TOKINA 35mm F/2,8 Macro ?
05-08-2011, 11:27 AM
[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1304852432' post='8128']
Do you plan to review the TOKINA 35mm F/2,8 Macro ? [/quote] Yep. --Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
05-09-2011, 05:54 AM
I also wish for a review for this one, although I've bought it...
05-13-2011, 02:29 AM
And when will the review come? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
05-13-2011, 05:39 AM
Until then, you can take a look at the Pentax DA 35mm f/2.8 - the numbers can't be directly compared, but they will give you a hint. Pentax was kind enough to let Tokina use the optical design of a Limited; a pity that the Tokina is so ugly.
http://www.opticallimits.com/pentax/393-pentax_35_28
05-13-2011, 05:48 AM
[quote name='Kunzite' timestamp='1305265198' post='8282']
Until then, you can take a look at the Pentax DA 35mm f/2.8 - the numbers can't be directly compared, but they will give you a hint. Pentax was kind enough to let Tokina use the optical design of a Limited; a pity that the Tokina is so ugly. http://www.opticallimits.com/pentax/393-pentax_35_28 [/quote] Thanks, the pentax's one is pretty
05-13-2011, 11:20 AM
[quote name='Kunzite' timestamp='1305265198' post='8282']
Until then, you can take a look at the Pentax DA 35mm f/2.8 - the numbers can't be directly compared, but they will give you a hint. Pentax was kind enough to let Tokina use the optical design of a Limited; a pity that the Tokina is so ugly. http://www.opticallimits.com/pentax/393-pentax_35_28 [/quote] Thanks for pointing this <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |