For my daughter.
Years of experience with a Minolta 35mm.
Wants a camera good for (in order of importance): landscapes, candid shooting (street and indoor), wildlife.
Wants easy portability (not too huge or heavy)
Wants a large bright viewfinder
Wants fast accurate auto focus
Occasional large prints (18 x24) but rarely.
Some video but also not a priority
Has narrowed it down to these cameras:
Canon 7D
Pentax K7
Olympus E5
Nikon D7000
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks.
MP
Does she own Minolta lenses?
She no longer has Minolta lenses.
And I meant the Pentax K5, not the K7.
Thanks.
Mark
[quote name='markpsf' timestamp='1305999739' post='8737']
Has narrowed it down to these cameras:
Canon 7D
Pentax K7
Olympus E5
Nikon D7000
[/quote]
I'd go for Nikon or Canon. Most complete systems. And you can be pretty sure they'll still be around 10 years from now...
This thread here may be worth looking at:
[url="http://forum.photozone.de/index.php?/topic/904-pentax-k-5-or-nikon-d7000-for-hiking-and-landscapes/page__pid__7941#entry7941"]K5 or D7000 for hiking[/url]
[quote name='markpsf' timestamp='1305999739' post='8737']
For my daughter.
Years of experience with a Minolta 35mm.
Wants a camera good for (in order of importance): landscapes, candid shooting (street and indoor), wildlife.
Wants easy portability (not too huge or heavy)
Wants a large bright viewfinder
Wants fast accurate auto focus
Occasional large prints (18 x24) but rarely.
Some video but also not a priority
Has narrowed it down to these cameras:
Canon 7D
Pentax K7
Olympus E5
Nikon D7000
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks.
MP
[/quote]
All cameras are good. One I think is missing: The Canon EOS 60D.
View finder:
None will have a view finder that is as big as your daughter is used to, as far As I know film viewfinders were bigger even on cheap Minolta SLRs. All of the above view finders are more or less comparable, just the EOS 60D's is not 100% (misses a small part at the edges).
Portability:
Depends a lot on the lenses, less on the body (since you mention wild life)...
The Pentax body is most compact.
Wild life is the tricky one... Wildlife with small apertures, the E5 will win in portability, since it has the smallest sensor and can get away with smaller focal lengths. But when you want wider apertures for more subject separation, the E5 becomes less attractive, because then its lenses become more expensive, heavier than with the others.
Auto Focus:
All 4(5) offer fast and accurate autofocus, depending on which lens is used of course. Pentax and Olympus used to be so-so in this area, but with the E5 and K5 they have made big strides, closing the gap with Canon and Nikon quite a bit.
Print size:
All of the cameras offer enough pixel resolution for 18x24 prints. 18x24 is a 3:4 format though, only the E5 offers the (in my view) less attractive 4:3 format, the others have the regular (from 35mm film) 3:2 format.
Video:
Video with DSLRs is not for home video stuff. The reason: The shallow DOF. Shallow DOF means that auto focus is always a nightmare to sit through in viewings, because you see it happen. You either see the focus move and search for the subject, making the focus shift through the scene, or you see the focus try to keep up with the subject, making for the same effect of scene focus shifting... just a not so lovely effect. For home video with AF, any simple compact video cam will be a better choice, since it will offer AF and a big DOF.
If you/one is aware of that limitation, shallow DOF video with DSLRs can give very cinematic and impressive results. But it will require a more cinematic planning of shooting subjects/scenes in "takes".
All cameras offer ok video, the Canons having the best implementations features/settings wise.
Landscape:
Seems easy to advice, but is not that simple to interpret... Different people have different styles, some want ultra wide angle for landscapes, some use more moderate wide angle, some for instance portrait teles... Some swear by primes, some use flexible zooms. All of the cameras above should offer plenty of lens choices to accommodate whatever lens wish your daughter would have.
Candid shooting:
Also a bit tricky... some love to use the 35mm field of view for street photography, others feel that with longer lenses they can capture more candid shots... For the Canon/Nikon/Pentax the 35mm equivalent would be lenses with 20 to 24mm focal length.
Any kit lens will offer that focal length, any 17/18-50-55mm f2.8 lens offers that focal length.
Prime lenses can offer more DOF choice, which some do need/require. Or they are smaller/less conspicuous than the f2.8 zooms.
Canon has the quite impressive still, optically, 24mm f2.8.
Nikon has also a 24mm f2.8, a tad less impressive for today's standards (but i'm sure can still be a pleasure to use, with proper CA treatment).
Pentax has the super compact 21mm f3.2, which performs well, and probably another one in this class.
Nikon and Canon both offer an impressive 24mm f1.4, but they are quite heavy and very expensive.
And for Canon and Nikon there is the lovely (build wise) Voigtlander 20mm f3.5 SL II, a manual focus lens which is also very compact.
Longer candids... I would choose a 85mm f1.8, the field of view those give just make for beautiful candid shots. Both Nikon and Canon offer one, the Canon focussing faster and having a bit smoother bokeh, both lenses being sharp and very affordable.
Olympus: The 17-18mm focal length makes the kit lenses and standard zoom lenses the lenses to choose. No prime options, really. Also the longer focal length candids, no equivalent really for what the Canon and Nikon offer.
Camera body:
The Nikon seems a bit less well liked concerning grip/feel/control layout/design than the other 3(4), and than other Nikon bodies.
The Pentax seems very well liked in this respect.
The Canon's offer a great live view implementation, a lesser implementation with big usability issues. Not sure how well the K5's live view is implemented, but probably quite good.
All in all, a tricky choice.. all cameras are good, lens choices will have different winners in different categories.
I would avoid stepping into the 4/3rds platform, as its future seems the least sure. And the lenses in certain areas are more restricted.
The Canon has a slight advantage wild life wise, if for instance the 100-400 L lens would be what would be needed for what your daughter looks for. If 300mm is the limit, portability wise and price wise, both Canon and Nikon offer several options including the Tamron 70-300 VC.
Olympus offers the 70-300 (smaller aperture though) too, with more reach due to the smaller sensor.
Don't think you have gotten things more clear now, it is just too multifaceted a query to get a definitive choice/answer.
A bit depends on if she wants a couple of good zooms or a handful of primes.
I would consider the GH2 over the E-5 (esp given weight concerns). I think the olympus ssm lenses will auto focus on the Gh2 but not 100% sure haven't really paid much attention to compatibility rules between micro 4:3 and 4:3. The GH2 has a better sensors than the E-5 and (imho) a more interesting body.
-
Olympus has some of the very best lenses and overall the 4:3 trims a bit off the weight; also their support and quality (for the optics) tend to be very high but their cameras are less special.
-
Pentax has some of the best primes (as a set) but their ssm motors have had a high rate of failure and their support sucks (from what I've read; I do not use pentax first hand; but in usa there has been a large number of complaints with motoros failing in their newer zooms). A lot of folks like the K5
-
I'm not a nikon user or lover and will let others comment; though it tends to be the heaviest system over all.
-
Canon tends to be a few grams lighter than nikon but a lot heavier than olympus and pentax. There is no clear winner here as it depends on chosen body and lens (you picked the body above but didn't name the lens). Traditionally canon was a lot less expensive than nikon (usa) but int he past year this is now less so. In USA support for canon is excellent. For nikon less so and nikon USA will not touch imported nikon (grey market) product; mind you even if you are willing to pay the service they will refuse - we aren't talking warranty service here.
-
Sadly I do not think there is a perfect system; yet every system is probably good enough. Depending on where your daughter lives I would try to actually examine the different products first hand. While I do not own minolta; when I played with a a900 I was extremely impressed with the over all feel of the body and lenses.
-
As a reflection on what I said above; I use canon; have used olympus; avoid nikon; never used pentax. I have a special liking for olympus as a company (gh2 is panasonic) and think they have the very best lenses but think they made a mistake with 4;3. I have a special dislike for nikon usa policies; and I think hoya purchase of pentax was a bad thing and support for pentax will be difficult in usa (from what I've read has taken place the last few years).
-
I add the above paragraph so you understand my bias.
As an update.
First, I'm more than appreciative of the time you've each taken to respond and the thoroughness of some of these responses.
There is obviously no absolute best choice.
The E5 is great, but, as noted, the 4/3 format has drawbacks and it is a heavy camera for its class.
The D7 also seems large and heavy, tho probably the best all around of the four.
The K5 vs D7000 is a tough call.
I wish she could handle both, but that isn't possible where she lives. Pentaxes are not stocked in most places.
The viewfinder advantage goes to the Nikon, if not by a huge margin.
Nikon also has a much better zoom lens selection.
Pentax excels in the small prime lens category and would probably be the better camera for candid shooting.
Still waiting for "THE ANSWER" :-) .....knowing that is impossible.
MP
You won't get THE ANSWER, because there is no absolute answer. You need to think more about lenses than bodies IMO, because the availability of good lenses is the most important factor. All the cameras you quote are good, but who is going to be there 10 years from now? Olympus maybe not. Sony, Nikon and Canon for sure. Pentax most probably. Have her go touch the different ones and see what feels the best for her. If she is an experienced 35mm user, nobody else can tell what is best for her!!
[quote name='Vieux loup' timestamp='1306090764' post='8762']
You won't get THE ANSWER, because there is no absolute answer. You need to think more about lenses than bodies IMO, because the availability of good lenses is the most important factor. All the cameras you quote are good, but who is going to be there 10 years from now? Olympus maybe not. Sony, Nikon and Canon for sure. Pentax most probably. Have her go touch the different ones and see what feels the best for her. If she is an experienced 35mm user, nobody else can tell what is best for her!!
[/quote]
I wish she could try each of them. Yes on the Nikon and Canon. Not the Pentax. No local dealer carries it.
I like your logo. My totem animal! and I had a close relationship with a great domesticated Wolf-Belgian Shepard cross.
MP
|
