Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The ultimate set
#4
Thanks for your thoughts both,

I already have the 50-500 by Sigma and I really don't like it compared to results that I see from the Canon 100-400.



Even when stopping down to F11 I still don't get the same sharpness and contrast.



I also have the Sigma 105mm

It perform well but tend to break a lot... now I have to deal with the aperture blades which stopped function

and are stock some where around F7.1 (assuming).



This is another reason why I want to replace my lenses to an all Canon.





Why is the Sigma 8-16 is preferred on the Canon 10-22 ?

The wide side ?





And last but not least,

I'm thinking about the 180mm Macro as I love to photograph insects

probably my ring flash won't be anymore of tool here because of the length from the object

but I'm taking it in consideration.
  


Messages In This Thread
The ultimate set - by Yaniv - 07-17-2010, 08:34 AM
The ultimate set - by Brightcolours - 07-17-2010, 11:59 AM
The ultimate set - by Rainer - 07-17-2010, 01:15 PM
The ultimate set - by Yaniv - 07-17-2010, 01:23 PM
The ultimate set - by Guest - 07-17-2010, 05:07 PM
The ultimate set - by popo - 07-17-2010, 10:27 PM
The ultimate set - by wim - 07-17-2010, 10:29 PM
The ultimate set - by allanmb - 07-18-2010, 05:03 PM
The ultimate set - by Yakim - 07-19-2010, 01:57 PM
The ultimate set - by popo - 07-19-2010, 05:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)