08-12-2011, 06:53 PM
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1312445829' post='10386']
I will await the review and not judge before hand <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> I hope on high iso they do a better job (algorithm) than the hx9v. I actually had to take a couple of 3200 iso images with the sx230 and they are not so bad at small sizes; I should post a couple in the hex9v thread.
-
I have an interest in the system but I suspect m4/3 is more developed (esp with lenses). I guess a little depends on if I move back to colorado where I will want long lenses for the mountains.
[/quote]
But then, may I ask why do you need JPEG? What's your usage scenario that prefers JPEG over RAW?
I will await the review and not judge before hand <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> I hope on high iso they do a better job (algorithm) than the hx9v. I actually had to take a couple of 3200 iso images with the sx230 and they are not so bad at small sizes; I should post a couple in the hex9v thread.
-
I have an interest in the system but I suspect m4/3 is more developed (esp with lenses). I guess a little depends on if I move back to colorado where I will want long lenses for the mountains.
[/quote]
But then, may I ask why do you need JPEG? What's your usage scenario that prefers JPEG over RAW?