07-17-2010, 06:55 PM
[quote name='Bare' date='17 July 2010 - 07:32 PM' timestamp='1279391527' post='1070']
Plus for you, booo for Klaus.
One thing about this new Sigma is interesting, it will have same breathng as Nikkor VRII. Many peoples say this is actually good for close-up performance.
[/quote]
Who says that? It sucks for close up performance (it can not even get close). The Canons (all of them) are much better for close up. My EF 70-200 f4 L USM is fine close up, even wide open. And even with an extension tube fitted.
The difference with the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR II is HUGE, due to the bad breathing. A shame Sigma shows similar breathing now, Canon and Tamron show how it should/could be done.
Plus for you, booo for Klaus.
One thing about this new Sigma is interesting, it will have same breathng as Nikkor VRII. Many peoples say this is actually good for close-up performance.
[/quote]
Who says that? It sucks for close up performance (it can not even get close). The Canons (all of them) are much better for close up. My EF 70-200 f4 L USM is fine close up, even wide open. And even with an extension tube fitted.
The difference with the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR II is HUGE, due to the bad breathing. A shame Sigma shows similar breathing now, Canon and Tamron show how it should/could be done.