08-22-2011, 02:48 PM
Here is a user review of the 45f1.8 with some sample images:
http://robinwong.blogspot.com/2011/08/olympus-mzuiko-45mm-f18-review-petaling.html
-
A few comments; most of the subjects are near the center so it is hard to judge corner behavior; most of the shots are at 1250 iso and I'm going to presume jpeg from the camera (though on the ep-3 they are likely to be as good as post processing; but no clue on how much noise reduction was applied).
This is basically a 50f1.8; something folks had known how to make for $50 for years; the catch is that it is smaller than normal and might have improved corner resolution than your typical 50f1.8. Would be more interesting if it were f1.2.
-
ep-3 seems to perform ok at higher iso; certainly seems usable - at least at screen resolution; not sure how it holds up in print.
http://robinwong.blogspot.com/2011/08/olympus-mzuiko-45mm-f18-review-petaling.html
-
A few comments; most of the subjects are near the center so it is hard to judge corner behavior; most of the shots are at 1250 iso and I'm going to presume jpeg from the camera (though on the ep-3 they are likely to be as good as post processing; but no clue on how much noise reduction was applied).
This is basically a 50f1.8; something folks had known how to make for $50 for years; the catch is that it is smaller than normal and might have improved corner resolution than your typical 50f1.8. Would be more interesting if it were f1.2.
-
ep-3 seems to perform ok at higher iso; certainly seems usable - at least at screen resolution; not sure how it holds up in print.