08-25-2011, 09:40 PM
[quote name='Tiz' timestamp='1314302164' post='10998']
Thanks for the test.
But why would I buy such a bulky, mediocre and expensive prime lens?
If I am not interested in portability, I can go Sony SLT-A77, fullframe or Pentax 645.
This is what might be interesting: http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc498/43rumors/Schermata2011-08-25a090605.png
[/quote]
Bulky? Eh?
This is it, every product shot should be next to a euro coin !
Thanks for the review Klaus. I initially got stuck on the corner performance but it struck me that color rendition seems pretty nice right from f/2.0. When and if it reaches the 500-550€ I'll consider it.
If the "legendary" 12-50 f/2.3-something eventually arrives, which now seems unlikely with that 14-42 "X" lens. We sure need 6 14-4x lenses in MFT. Right Pany? Right Oly?
Thanks for the test.
But why would I buy such a bulky, mediocre and expensive prime lens?
If I am not interested in portability, I can go Sony SLT-A77, fullframe or Pentax 645.
This is what might be interesting: http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc498/43rumors/Schermata2011-08-25a090605.png
[/quote]
Bulky? Eh?
This is it, every product shot should be next to a euro coin !
Thanks for the review Klaus. I initially got stuck on the corner performance but it struck me that color rendition seems pretty nice right from f/2.0. When and if it reaches the 500-550€ I'll consider it.
If the "legendary" 12-50 f/2.3-something eventually arrives, which now seems unlikely with that 14-42 "X" lens. We sure need 6 14-4x lenses in MFT. Right Pany? Right Oly?