08-28-2011, 08:08 AM
[quote name='Martin_MM' timestamp='1314481307' post='11088']
First head-to-head high ISO comparison:
http://www.eoshd.com/content/3802/which-is-best-for-low-light-sony-nex-5n-or-nex-7-and-a77
Just as I thought, only average result by today´s standards. But look at 5n results! OMG, that 16mpx should have been put in A77/NEX7 bodies (to my likes...)
[/quote]
While the results from the GH2 and A77 look even more useless than the others, its a stupid comparison anyway. They are comparing the standard JPEH output, as far as I understand. If one really cares about the best performance, one would convert RAW with the best RAW converter that does not filter/smudge noise away.
So, a bit silly, that comparison...
First head-to-head high ISO comparison:
http://www.eoshd.com/content/3802/which-is-best-for-low-light-sony-nex-5n-or-nex-7-and-a77
Just as I thought, only average result by today´s standards. But look at 5n results! OMG, that 16mpx should have been put in A77/NEX7 bodies (to my likes...)
[/quote]
While the results from the GH2 and A77 look even more useless than the others, its a stupid comparison anyway. They are comparing the standard JPEH output, as far as I understand. If one really cares about the best performance, one would convert RAW with the best RAW converter that does not filter/smudge noise away.
So, a bit silly, that comparison...