• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance
Guest
Unregistered
 
#18
09-07-2011, 07:51 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315381462' post='11364']I do not advise this method for (ultra-)wide lenses which have a (negative) field curvature issue.[/quote]



Doesn´t the field curvature issue disappear when the lens is stopped down? I think this was the case for the Tamron 17-50 mm f/2.8 lens, which however is not ultra-wide.
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Rainer - 09-06-2011, 09:02 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by PuxaVida - 09-06-2011, 12:29 PM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Klaus - 09-06-2011, 12:34 PM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by frank - 09-06-2011, 03:56 PM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Klaus - 09-06-2011, 04:20 PM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by youpii - 09-06-2011, 07:42 PM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Klaus - 09-06-2011, 08:07 PM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Klaus - 09-07-2011, 04:52 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by frank - 09-07-2011, 06:11 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by frank - 09-07-2011, 06:17 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by PuxaVida - 09-07-2011, 06:33 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by frank - 09-07-2011, 07:00 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Klaus - 09-07-2011, 07:44 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Guest - 09-07-2011, 07:51 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by frank - 09-07-2011, 08:00 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by frank - 09-07-2011, 08:01 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by PuxaVida - 09-07-2011, 08:11 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Dick England - 09-07-2011, 08:23 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by Klaus - 09-07-2011, 08:48 AM
The (non)sense of hyperfocal distance - by frank - 09-07-2011, 09:28 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)