09-09-2011, 04:37 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1315580997' post='11460']
A better alternative is the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM. Better build quality, better AF, more contrasty optics and a better CA performance at the wide end, Includes image stabilization.
[/quote]
This Sigma .. better than the Tamron or than the Nikkor 16-85??.
As I have seen the prices are:
- Sigma 17-50: 649 euros
- Nikkor 16-85: 589 euros
- Tamron 17-50: 349 euros
Do you think these are the better options?
Pd.- Excuse me, but until now, I have been a Canon user.
A better alternative is the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM. Better build quality, better AF, more contrasty optics and a better CA performance at the wide end, Includes image stabilization.
[/quote]
This Sigma .. better than the Tamron or than the Nikkor 16-85??.
As I have seen the prices are:
- Sigma 17-50: 649 euros
- Nikkor 16-85: 589 euros
- Tamron 17-50: 349 euros
Do you think these are the better options?
Pd.- Excuse me, but until now, I have been a Canon user.