09-19-2011, 01:39 PM
Dear Klaus
More than 800 persons viewed this topic. I believe this is a topic which interest many.
I believe your readers place your reviews in high regard, and it would make sense to have lists of highly recommended lenses.
The lists can be static.
Readers can also visit the " DXOMark " website for lens rankings. This website rank all lenses and camera censors.
I am also interested in pure "image quality" that a lens produces, irrespective of built quality. I believe these two needs to be addressed seperately.
(A poorly built lens may produce an excellent image quality, whilst a lens built like a tank may have a poorer image quality. The consumer should be able to make an informed choice.)
Thanks for the great work you have done with this website.
More than 800 persons viewed this topic. I believe this is a topic which interest many.
I believe your readers place your reviews in high regard, and it would make sense to have lists of highly recommended lenses.
The lists can be static.
Readers can also visit the " DXOMark " website for lens rankings. This website rank all lenses and camera censors.
I am also interested in pure "image quality" that a lens produces, irrespective of built quality. I believe these two needs to be addressed seperately.
(A poorly built lens may produce an excellent image quality, whilst a lens built like a tank may have a poorer image quality. The consumer should be able to make an informed choice.)
Thanks for the great work you have done with this website.