09-25-2011, 02:27 PM
[quote name='jenbenn' timestamp='1316959907' post='11842']
Oh my god they have done it again: Heres another reason why its best to ignore DXO:
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/News/DxOMark-news/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-2.8L-IS-II-USM-measurements-and-review
I believe I dont need to comment their finding that the older 70-200 L IS has better resolutuion than the newer Mark II version)
[/quote]
DXOmark's lens tests are either highly unreliable, or just plain nonsensical. If just highly unreliable, lets put them together with SLRgear.
Oh my god they have done it again: Heres another reason why its best to ignore DXO:
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/News/DxOMark-news/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-2.8L-IS-II-USM-measurements-and-review
I believe I dont need to comment their finding that the older 70-200 L IS has better resolutuion than the newer Mark II version)
[/quote]
DXOmark's lens tests are either highly unreliable, or just plain nonsensical. If just highly unreliable, lets put them together with SLRgear.