09-27-2011, 08:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-27-2011, 08:52 AM by Brightcolours.)
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1317108544' post='11889']
Well I don not write sentences to make sense to "you"... Do not read them if you don't like or do not reply if you don't get the idea. But of course this is not the first time and will not be the last time that you "easily" misunderstand and miss the point (maybe intentionally)... The point is, drawing such silly conclusions based only on IQ comparisons with non-comparable products, and doing this for a product which is not yet placed in the market officially, is a very useless thing and creates a sterile discussion. It just takes space in the useless side of the net. I personally see those kind of brand-worshipper reviews as "disinformation" and have no tolerance for such crap. It is basicly misusage of the information medium (here, internet). Furthermore, the way the statements are written is very childish because one can sense that it's kind a smear campaign including a subtle fear that V1/J1 can replace G12.
[/quote]
You saying it was childish to use internet as an info resource, that made really no sense to me. So I put question marks, as I was under the impression you must have meant something different (which you did).
You saying to not read it when your sentence makes no sense, or not reply when I don't understand you, THAT is childish.
Drawing conclusions about the Nikon V1/J1, where image samples are available, exact data about both models are available and even MTF's from Nikon are available, where even hands on experiences are being shared, is not useless at all. From all that data, one really can make conclusions about if one likes certain things about them or not.
Now can you rest the hostilities?
Well I don not write sentences to make sense to "you"... Do not read them if you don't like or do not reply if you don't get the idea. But of course this is not the first time and will not be the last time that you "easily" misunderstand and miss the point (maybe intentionally)... The point is, drawing such silly conclusions based only on IQ comparisons with non-comparable products, and doing this for a product which is not yet placed in the market officially, is a very useless thing and creates a sterile discussion. It just takes space in the useless side of the net. I personally see those kind of brand-worshipper reviews as "disinformation" and have no tolerance for such crap. It is basicly misusage of the information medium (here, internet). Furthermore, the way the statements are written is very childish because one can sense that it's kind a smear campaign including a subtle fear that V1/J1 can replace G12.
[/quote]
You saying it was childish to use internet as an info resource, that made really no sense to me. So I put question marks, as I was under the impression you must have meant something different (which you did).
You saying to not read it when your sentence makes no sense, or not reply when I don't understand you, THAT is childish.
Drawing conclusions about the Nikon V1/J1, where image samples are available, exact data about both models are available and even MTF's from Nikon are available, where even hands on experiences are being shared, is not useless at all. From all that data, one really can make conclusions about if one likes certain things about them or not.
Now can you rest the hostilities?