01-09-2012, 06:30 PM
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1326132474' post='14588']
Sounds like a take on 5 y.o. Sony R1 to me, but more traditionally shaped. Not sure there's anything that could interest me here.
[/quote]
Compared to the Sony R1 it is small. And the R1 had no OVF. And 3:2 aspect ratio.
It is best compared to the Panasonic GF/X and the X-lenses.
I wonder what the EVIL from Canon will be like, if it has this same sensor format or bigger. I hope a different sensor format (bigger) with nicer aspect ratio (not 4:3). Time will tell.
What this camera is is what the name suggests: a G series camera. And as such it is quite nice (compact digital). But also quite expensive. How will its optics fare?
Sounds like a take on 5 y.o. Sony R1 to me, but more traditionally shaped. Not sure there's anything that could interest me here.
[/quote]
Compared to the Sony R1 it is small. And the R1 had no OVF. And 3:2 aspect ratio.
It is best compared to the Panasonic GF/X and the X-lenses.
I wonder what the EVIL from Canon will be like, if it has this same sensor format or bigger. I hope a different sensor format (bigger) with nicer aspect ratio (not 4:3). Time will tell.
What this camera is is what the name suggests: a G series camera. And as such it is quite nice (compact digital). But also quite expensive. How will its optics fare?