01-10-2012, 11:36 AM
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1326194443' post='14657']
Waitasec... 12-24/4 IS? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> ZOMG
The 70-200/4 IS sounds nice though.
[/quote]
So ? The Nikkor 16-35/4 VR has also an image stabilizer. So nothing unique (but seldom).
Personally I would prefer non-IS lenses across the board (and no in-bodys IS) but that's me.
Waitasec... 12-24/4 IS? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> ZOMG
The 70-200/4 IS sounds nice though.
[/quote]
So ? The Nikkor 16-35/4 VR has also an image stabilizer. So nothing unique (but seldom).
Personally I would prefer non-IS lenses across the board (and no in-bodys IS) but that's me.