01-22-2012, 04:57 PM
Interesting to compare those two sentences :
-The future is mirrorless.
-The future for toy cameras is mirrorless.
Thom concludes that as of early 2012. A personal assessment written in the present tense. Hardly an indication of a future trend. I don't suppose you can deny that the industry is slowly but surely going the mirrorless way from the entry market to higher grade products and not only for marketing reasons. As processing power increases, mechanical complexity and tolerance is shifting towards electronic & software engineering which yields are much higher, replaceable, easy to differentiate, etc...
I sure have a bias towards mirrorless cameras but still, when I read both sentences, one seems obviously aimed at totally dismissing the other one regardless of, what seems to me, indisputable evidences of a solid trend.
Greetings,
S.
-The future is mirrorless.
-The future for toy cameras is mirrorless.
Thom concludes that as of early 2012. A personal assessment written in the present tense. Hardly an indication of a future trend. I don't suppose you can deny that the industry is slowly but surely going the mirrorless way from the entry market to higher grade products and not only for marketing reasons. As processing power increases, mechanical complexity and tolerance is shifting towards electronic & software engineering which yields are much higher, replaceable, easy to differentiate, etc...
I sure have a bias towards mirrorless cameras but still, when I read both sentences, one seems obviously aimed at totally dismissing the other one regardless of, what seems to me, indisputable evidences of a solid trend.
Greetings,
S.