Hi Klaus,
If those bad corners are symmetrical, and those lenses have better results on other cameras, I guess it must be a sensor issue.
I stil lthink in-body IS is not a good thing, despite many people seeming to clamor for it: position of the sensor is even more critical than positioning of a few lens elements, and much harder to control <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.
Kind regards, Wim
If those bad corners are symmetrical, and those lenses have better results on other cameras, I guess it must be a sensor issue.
I stil lthink in-body IS is not a good thing, despite many people seeming to clamor for it: position of the sensor is even more critical than positioning of a few lens elements, and much harder to control <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
