02-06-2012, 03:23 PM
Sounds like the same kind of debate than 40mm vs 50mm.
The 20mm f/1.7 could be regarded as quite abnormal in these times of 35 or 50mm, yet, it's quite easy to get used to. I don't suppose it would be that hard for a 135mm shooter.
I'm not very used to teles but would you say that 150mm equiv. starts to make sense as a "landscape compressor" ?
Greetings,
S.
The 20mm f/1.7 could be regarded as quite abnormal in these times of 35 or 50mm, yet, it's quite easy to get used to. I don't suppose it would be that hard for a 135mm shooter.
I'm not very used to teles but would you say that 150mm equiv. starts to make sense as a "landscape compressor" ?
Greetings,
S.