[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1328533423' post='15519']
I do not really "get" 150mm f3.6. A tad long for portraits. Not overly long for sports tele like the 200mm's on full frame. Does not open that super wide either, for subject sparation, like the 200mm f2's on FF do.
Nope, I do not really get thisone.
[/quote]
May I suggest you get yourself a 8x10 inch camera? With an anti-scheimpflug (see [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheimpflug_principle"]http://en.wikipedia....pflug_principle[/url] if needed), that will get you a subject separation your FF can only dream of, even with an f/1.0 lens.
To me, within the µFT context this lens makes sense. µFT is not about maximum subject separation, but neither is FF. This is the domain of even larger formats than FF.
I do not really "get" 150mm f3.6. A tad long for portraits. Not overly long for sports tele like the 200mm's on full frame. Does not open that super wide either, for subject sparation, like the 200mm f2's on FF do.
Nope, I do not really get thisone.
[/quote]
May I suggest you get yourself a 8x10 inch camera? With an anti-scheimpflug (see [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheimpflug_principle"]http://en.wikipedia....pflug_principle[/url] if needed), that will get you a subject separation your FF can only dream of, even with an f/1.0 lens.
To me, within the µFT context this lens makes sense. µFT is not about maximum subject separation, but neither is FF. This is the domain of even larger formats than FF.
enjoy